Col. of Charleston
Men - Women
2016 - 2017 - 2018
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
631  Tess Masselink FR 21:02
981  Cate Ambrose FR 21:27
1,023  Victoria Churchill SR 21:30
1,318  Ellen Feringa JR 21:49
1,872  Marissa Small-Towns SR 22:24
2,610  Jace Kosiorek JR 23:27
National Rank #183 of 348
Southeast Region Rank #23 of 50
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 22nd at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 33.7%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Tess Masselink Cate Ambrose Victoria Churchill Ellen Feringa Marissa Small-Towns Jace Kosiorek
Mountain to Sea Open 09/16 1213 21:08 21:34 21:29 22:25 22:31 23:35
Will Wilson Citadel Invitational 09/30
Louisville Classic (Gold) 09/30 1163 20:51 21:09 21:25 21:56 22:25 23:31
ECU Pirates Invitational 10/13 1204 21:04 21:40 22:03 21:28 22:01 23:08
CAA Championship 10/28 1218 21:11 21:31 21:39 21:48 22:41 23:02
Southeast Region Championships 11/10 1189 20:59 21:23 21:25 21:52 22:34 23:17





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 21.4 642 0.1 0.4 0.7 2.2 3.7 5.6 9.8 11.3 15.4 16.3 15.8 10.3 5.2 2.7 0.6 0.1 0.2 0.1



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Tess Masselink 77.6 0.1
Cate Ambrose 111.2
Victoria Churchill 115.5
Ellen Feringa 145.0
Marissa Small-Towns 190.3
Jace Kosiorek 247.8




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 0.1% 0.1 13
14 0.4% 0.4 14
15 0.7% 0.7 15
16 2.2% 2.2 16
17 3.7% 3.7 17
18 5.6% 5.6 18
19 9.8% 9.8 19
20 11.3% 11.3 20
21 15.4% 15.4 21
22 16.3% 16.3 22
23 15.8% 15.8 23
24 10.3% 10.3 24
25 5.2% 5.2 25
26 2.7% 2.7 26
27 0.6% 0.6 27
28 0.1% 0.1 28
29 0.2% 0.2 29
30 30
31 0.1% 0.1 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
42 42
43 43
44 44
45 45
46 46
47 47
48 48
49 49
50 50
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0